Submissions on measures to increase accountability and transparency for Refused Classification material
Public consultation on measures to improve accountability and transparency of processes for the placement of material on the RC content list closed on 12 February 2010. A consultation paper outlining a number of issues and options was provided for comment.
The Department will now work with other government agencies to consider closely these submissions and examine whether the matters raised can enhance the proposed accountability and transparency measures.
Submissions (alphabetical list)
Submissions are grouped alphabetically by publication name. Submissions beginning with a title are listed under that title. For example, Dr Smith is listed under D.
The Department reserved the right not to publish any submission, or part of a submission, which in its view breached applicable laws, promoted a product or service, contained offensive language, or expressed sentiments that are likely to offend or vilify sections of the community. The Department has not published submissions received which have been marked as confidential.
Warning: some submissions contain material that some readers may find offensive.
| Submission ID | Publication Name |
|---|---|
| 229 | Tan |
| 262 | Telstra Coporation Limited |
| 86 | Templeton |
| 226 | Terry, optimistically a citizen of a rational and civilized state. |
| 21 | The People of Australia |
| 39 | Thomas Ault |
| 111 | Timothy O'Toole |
| 50 | Tristan Tucker |
Please note: The submission ID is a system-generated number and does not reflect the number of submissions received.
